Toye sees all this, clearly and emphatically In the end, the words of the great and glorious Churchill who resisted dictatorship overwhelmed the works of the cruel and cramped Churchill who tried to impose it on the world's people of color. Toye teases out these ambiguities beautifully. The fact that we now live at a time where a free and independent India is an emerging superpower in the process of eclipsing Britain, and a grandson of the Kikuyu 'savages' is the most powerful man in the world, is a repudiation of Churchill at his ugliest--and a sweet, unsought victory for Churchill at his best.
So it is surprising that, until Richard Toye took on the task, little has been written in book form about Churchill and the British Empire What is not generally or popularly recognized--but rectified by Toye--is that there were many Churchillian views on empire Toye argues convincingly that Churchill's views on empire were not a fixed thing--and were not designed simply to enhance Britain's role in the world The Empire faded as Churchill's life did.
But there was triumph after all, perhaps even a bit of poetry. The glory of them both--Empire and Churchill--survives them both. Shribman, The Boston Globe. Even veterans of Churchilliana will find plenty of fresh material, recounted with wit and insight into a man whose values were shaped by an age that no longer existed. This is a carefully researched and exceptionally well-documented book that is a welcome addition to the literature. It is not a traditional biography but more of a study of Churchill's behavior in a central area of his career.
It makes extensive use of government archives, diaries, and secondary sources. The citation of newspaper articles to underscore the broader reaction to Churchill's actions is especially welcome. It is fascinating reading.
What is Kobo Super Points?
Toye considers this enormously complicated subject with admirable equanimity. Toye traces Churchill's shifts and velleities with impressive skill and erudition, using a vast range of contemporary newspapers to particularly good effect An important and original book.
This work is a valuable contribution to greater understanding of an historical icon. Toye should be congratulated for steering clear of either simple apologia or political correctness.
Find in a library : Churchill's empire : the world that made him and the world he made
Following reviews, diaries and letters, he recreates the broad spectrum of imperialism at the time and presents Churchill's drift into die-hard mode as a conscious move of political repositioning Churchill lovers will gain a clear sense of the culture and politics that has shaped his imperial outlook. At the same time, they will find a judicious account of the limitations of Churchill's power Rather than yet another biography of Churchill, Toye has given us a thought-provoking, sensitive account of the nerve and muscle of empire.
It's a complex and fascinating story Everything we are doing and saying is thrilling—it will be read by a thousand generations, think of that! Why I would not be out of this glorious delicious war for anything the world could give me. In an effort to claim control of the Dardanelles Straits and thus freeze Turkey out of the war, he was responsible for an operation sending British, French, New Zealander, and Australian forces — mostly volunteers, half-trained — to besiege the Gallipoli Peninsula.
The ensuing debacle chewed up those units, and resulted in Churchill being demoted, leaving the government, and joining the Army to command a battalion. Had his ruling class credentials been less estimable, he might have been unmade by his failure.
- Settlement, Urbanization, and Population (Oxford Studies on the Roman Economy).
- VII. The Wretched of the Earth.
- Churchill's Empire: The World That Made Him and the World He Made by Richard Toye.
Instead, he returned to parliament in and once again rose through the ranks — minister of munitions, secretary of war, and then secretary of air. Resorting to bestiary for his imagery, he compared self-rule to the dog running its own manger, a right he did not acknowledge.
The Two Churchills
As an imperial tactician, Churchill recommended fighting the insurgency in British Mandate Iraq by gassing them. Indeed, he had already pioneered such deadly weapons in Russia, against the Bolsheviks. It is important to recognize that, as with his support for aerial combat, he tended to justify this as a humane, high-tech alternative to more brutal methods.
Even the use of nuclear weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified in part as a means to save lives. Churchill, as a liberal Tory, ought perhaps to have been alarmed by the rise of fascism in Europe. Yet he was overwhelmingly sanguine. He believed Mussolini to be a good ruler for Italy, and fascism a useful bulwark against Communism.
His nationalism, militarism, and support for social order and tradition colored his interpretation of the emerging movement. That was far off, in a zone seen as legitimate for colonial conquest. As for the Third Reich, many of its strategic and territorial conceptions drew inspiration from the British Empire. Hitler wanted to take the motifs of empire and apply them to Europe. But expanding across the European mainland was another proposition.
In other words, fascism only became a problem when Churchill recognized a threat to the British Empire and the European order of nation-states to which it was integrated. Only then, and only in that regard, did fascism become worse than Communism. Yet he continued to think that the Nazis might be isolated, and that an axis of unity might be forged with Italian and Spanish fascisms, and as such continued to flatter Mussolini and opposed any support for Republican Spain. Even after his appointment, Churchill persisted in seeking an alliance with the less globally ambitious fascist regimes.
Down the ages above all other calls comes the cry that the joint heirs of Latin and Christian civilization must not be ranged against one another in mortal strife. Hearken to it, I beseech you in all honor and respect before the dread signal is given. The same year, he addressed Franco in a similar tone :.
British interests and policy are based on the independence and unity of Spain and we look forward to seeing her take her rightful place both as a great Mediterranean Power and as a leading and famous member of the family of Europe and Christendom. While this was unavailing in Italy, Churchill did succeed in striking an alliance with Franco that extended the life of his regime. Of course, as many people have suggested, the Second World War was not merely one war. Even in Britain, there was a marked radicalization after , and concerted efforts to turn the war effort into a popular, antifascist war.
For Churchill, however, it was an imperialist war alone, and he prosecuted it as such. It was the British who first bombed civilians during that conflict, attacking them in the suburbs of Berlin. The tactic of incinerating civilians bet, absurdly, on the idea that this would demoralize the population and grind down the resistance — an idea that the British Empire had to be repeatedly disabused of in the colonial wars. But to Churchill, this would have been simply unthinkable.
About This Item
This was the man who had joined a cavalry charge in Omdurman to avenge General Gordon, and whose whole military career was marked by an enthusiastic love of danger and death. Total war was the logical culmination. You begin with oil, you will quickly end in blood. Churchill ended the war greatly diminished. He had been extremely popular during it, and would continue to be widely respected for his decision to fight, and his implacable energy in fighting.
But there was demand for major social reform, and that meant a Labour landslide. He enjoyed one more stint as prime minister beginning in , during which he maintained most of the reforms implemented by Labour, and — this was also mostly bipartisan — waged brutal, uncompromising war against the Mau Mau uprising in Kenya and the Malayan insurgency. In the Malayan Emergency, Churchill was once more a modernizer: Britain was the first state to use Agent Orange and similar herbicides, and cheerfully adopted the same policy of saturation bombardment that the United States would deploy in Vietnam.
And then, falling decisively ill, Churchill retired. But the people he saw fit to rule, in most cases succeeded in overthrowing that rule, in part precisely because of the worldwide mobilizations triggered in the struggle against Hitler. It makes sense that the British state idolizes Churchill.